I've gone from being a soft touch (see earlier blog) to a callous brute.
Yesterday a man rang asking me to come to Sainsbury's and buy food for the weekend. I politely refused on the stated grounds that I was tied up all day. This was basically true. I only just had time to do my essential preparation, visit the hospital and lead the evening nurture course. If I had taken half an hour to deal with this request I wouldn't have had time to do the rest. But of course, the real reason for my refusal was I just didn't want to.
I can attempt to justify this. The man had come from the Job Centre where he was having trouble getting hold of the money he was owed. I didn't fully grasp his story, but it was clear his financial planning had gone astray and he had got himself in a mess. Even assuming he was genuine, should it be my responsibility to bail him out? (That's not a rhetorical question. The answer is arguably yes.)
This morning, the speaker on Thought for the Day told of how he gave money to someone needing a train ticket (a clear con) because he believed the man should be treated as a person and not ignored as if he didn't exist. But how do you treat a con man as a person? Neither ignoring him nor giving him money seem a good idea. Is a polite refusal enough? What about saying, "I don't believe a word of it, but God loves you anyway" Or perhaps, "I'm not going to give you money, but if you give me your name I'll pray for you."
Saturday, 29 September 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment